After the discussion last week regarding signified and
signifier, the meaning of a work, and even beauty…..(anne-claire J ). It was interesting
to see the different take this week. It delved into much of what Moustapha was
saying in that yes there may be an underlying meaning behind certain things but
in the end it is us, the audience, the people buying the books, the people
reading the works, that interpret it as we see fit. The view that we take on is
not only influenced by our experiences and knowledge but lack there. Not many
people, including myself, may understand the works of many well-known authors
in literature. It is not for lack of trying but perhaps lack of previous
experience (in my case… I will own up to that), lack of education, or even lack
of interest.
Either way, it is us who decide what is great and what is
not….of course, one could argue that there are other external factors that come
into play, especially now of days. With all the hoop-la in the world, it seems
that many authors have gained a large amount of exposure and fame due to their
financial benefactors and supporters. Such attention can turn the sales of a
book from 100s to 1,000s to millions in little to no time at all. Of course,
this then leads to the questions: Do the sales of a book determine its value
against other books? Which then leads to…what is the value of a book and how is
it truly established?
I feel that Bourdieu would say that the value of the book
relies on people’s tastes, which are sometimes shaped by the social order they
have created for themselves or have come to accept as truth…. or am I way off?
I found his take on social order to be very interesting. I
can admit that I myself have come to seeing things in certain ways due to personal
experiences within society. For example, while working at a private school in
Houston, I came to learn what real “designer” bags, shoes, and clothes looked
like and meant to the mothers of the children attending our school. And, I even
witnessed many instances in which parents spoke differently to one another after
looking at artificial things such as one’s attire, car, etc. They seemed to have
categorized other people into social classes lower than their own. All I can
say is that I hope never to be a member of such a group…or am I part of one and
don’t know it Bourdieu?
No comments:
Post a Comment